[Lim's publication] Framing Bouazizi: ‘White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising
Please find below the newly published article on the 2010-2011 Tunisian uprising.
Framing Bouazizi: ‘White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising
by Merlyna Lim, Arizona State University
cited as: Lim, M. (2013) Framing Bouazizi: ‘White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising, Journalism: Theory, Praxis, and Criticism, doi:10.1177/1464884913478359
Abstract
By delving into the detailed account of the Tunisian uprising, this article offers an explanation that sets the 2010 uprising apart from its precursors. The 2010 uprising was successful because activists successfully managed to bridge geographical and class divides as well as to converge offline and online activisms. Such connection and convergence were made possible, first, through the availability of dramatic visual evidence that turned a local incident into a spectacle. Second, by successful frame alignment with a master narrative that culturally and politically resonated with the entire population. Third, by activating a hybrid network made of the connective structures to facilitate collective action – among Tunisians who shared collective identities and collective frames – and connective action – among individuals who sought more personalized paths to contribute to the movement through digital media.
Full text is available here: http://JOU.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/02/28/1464884913478359.full.pdf+html
or for those who have no access via university library, the pdf copy is here.











Thanks for bringing this ‘Framing Bouazizi’ issue.
It is always very difficult at any level, to deal with social justice related to high unemployment, oppression, politic and family/support and suicide/ self inflicted wound. ‘Hybrid’ action, not only in words seems will sustain for a long time.
Movement through digital media not only powerful to replacing the regime, but also for survival in daily life among urban poor locally.
[Reply]
mer Reply:
March 20th, 2013 at 2:54 pm
thanks for your comment. you’re right, what’s more important is the empowerment, engagement, and participation of the citizen (especially the marginalized) on the ground after the regime change rather than the revolt itself.
[Reply]
Leave your response!